Published online: 27 May 2007; | doi:10.1038/news070521-13 / http://www.nature.com/news/2007/070521/full/070521-13.html
Geneticists identify four new breast-cancer genes
Discovery adds to understanding of individuals' susceptibility.John Whitfield


| Knowing more breast-cancer genes could help provide bespoke treatments. Corbis |
|
A large-scale genetic study has identified four new genes that significantly affect a woman's risk of developing breast cancer.
The
finding could allow doctors to predict cancer risk more accurately, and
to guide treatments to prevent and cure the disease. But more important
is what it might tell researchers about how the disease works, says
Douglas Easton of the University of Cambridge, a member of the team
that made the discovery. "We had no inkling that these genes had
anything to do with breast cancer," he says.
Breast
cancer - which will affect about one in every nine women in Britain and
the United States - is known to have a strong genetic influence. But
until now, known genes could account for only about a quarter of the
genetic component of cancer risk.
To
search for some of the many other genes thought to make small
differences to a woman's breast-cancer risk, Easton and his colleagues
compared the genomes of some 4,400 women with breast cancer with those
of about 4,300 who did not have the disease.
They
identified 30 differences in single DNA bases that seemed to be linked
to the disease. These were then compared in more than 20,000 women with
breast cancer and in a similar number of controls. The results are
reported in
Nature.
Growing painsThree
of the newly discovered genes are involved in controlling the growth of
cells. The gene with the strongest association was fibroblast growth
factor receptor 2, or
FGFR2.
Women
who have two copies of the high-risk version of this gene - about 16%
of the population - have a 60% greater chance of developing breast
cancer than do those with no copies of the gene, Easton and his
colleagues found.
At
present, scanning these newly discovered genes would tell us little
about a woman's cancer risk. But as more and more genetic risk factors
are uncovered, genetic profiling could give doctors a fine-grained
picture of individual risk, and could even lead to bespoke treatments
offering the best chance of preventing or treating the disease.
"As more genes are identified, tests will become more
predictive," says Easton. "I wouldn't be at all surprised if there were
dozens or hundred of genes involved." A similar approach ought to work
for other diseases - Easton is now studying prostate cancer.
Two further studies also identify further genetic variants associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. One, looking at about 2,000 postmenopausal women and a similar number of controls, also identified genetic variants in the
FGFR2 gene associated with increased cancer risk. And in the other, researchers studying Icelandic women found mutations on chromosomes 2 and 16 that seem to heighten the risk of cancer.
References- Easton D. F., et al. Nature, doi:10.1038/nature05887 (2007).
- Hunter D. J., et al. Nature Genet. , doi:10.1038/ng2075 (2007).
- Stacey S. N., et al. Nature Genet., 10.1038/ng2064 (2007).