ublished online: 6 June 2007; | doi:10.1038/447618a / http://www.nature.com/news/2007/070604/full/447618a.html
Simple switch turns cells embryonic
Technique removes need for eggs or embryos.David Cyranoski
Research
reported this week by three different groups shows that normal skin
cells can be reprogrammed to an embryonic state in mice. The race is now on to apply the surprisingly straightforward procedure to human cells.
If
researchers succeed, it will make it relatively easy to produce cells
that seem indistinguishable from embryonic stem cells, and that are
genetically matched to individual patients. There are limits to how
useful and safe these would be for therapeutic use in the near term,
but they should quickly prove a boon in the lab.


| The birth of this chimaeric mouse suggests that the cells used to generate it behave like embryonic stem cells. S. OGDEN |
|
"It
would change the way we see things quite dramatically," says Alan
Trounson of Monash University in Victoria, Australia. Trounson wasn't
involved in the new work but says he plans to start using the technique
"tomorrow". "I can think of a dozen experiments right now - and they're
all good ones," he says.
In
theory, embryonic stem cells can propagate themselves indefinitely and
are able to become any type of cell in the body. But so far, the only
way to obtain embryonic stem cells involves destroying an embryo, and
to get a genetic match for a patient would mean, in effect, cloning
that person - all of which raise difficult ethical questions.
As
well as having potential ethical difficulties, the 'cloning' procedure
is technically difficult. It involves obtaining unfertilized eggs,
replacing their genetic material with that from an adult cell and then
forcing the cell to divide to create an early-stage embryo, from which
the stem cells can be harvested. Those barriers may have now been
broken down.
"Neither
eggs nor embryos are necessary. I've never worked with either," says
Shinya Yamanaka of Kyoto University, who has pioneered the new
technique.
Last
year, Yamanaka introduced a system that uses mouse fibroblasts, a
common cell type that can easily be harvested from skin, instead of eggs.
Four genes, which code for four specific proteins known as
transcription factors, are transferred into the cells using
retroviruses. The proteins trigger the expression of other genes that
lead the cells to become pluripotent, meaning that they could
potentially become any of the body's cells. Yamanaka calls them induced
pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells). "It's easy. There's no trick, no
magic," says Yamanaka.
The
results were met with amazement, along with a good dose of scepticism.
Four factors seemed too simple. And although the cells had some
characteristics of embryonic cells - they formed colonies, could
propagate continuously and could form cancerous growths called
teratomas - they lacked others. Introduction of iPS cells into a
developing embryo, for example, did not produce a 'chimaera' - a mouse
carrying a mix of DNA from both the original embryo and the iPS cells
throughout its body. "I was not comfortable with the term 'pluripotent'
last year," says Hans Schöler, a stem-cell specialist at the Max Planck
Institute for Molecular Biomedicine in Münster who is not involved with
any of the three articles.
This week, Yamanaka presents a second generation of iPS cells, which pass all these tests. In addition, a group led by Rudolf Jaenisch at the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and a collaborative effort
between Konrad Hochedlinger of the Harvard Stem Cell Institute and
Kathrin Plath of the University of California, Los Angeles, used the
same four factors and got strikingly similar results.
"It's
a relief as some people questioned our results, especially after the
Hwang scandal," says Yamanaka, referring to the irreproducible cloning
work of Woo Suk Hwang, which turned out to be fraudulent. Schöler
agrees: "Now we can be confident that this is something worth building
on."
The
improvement over last year's results was simple. The four transcription
factors used by Yamanaka reprogramme cells inconsistently and
inefficiently, so that less than 0.1% of the million cells in a simple
skin biopsy will be fully reprogrammed. The difficulty is isolating
those in which reprogramming has been successful. Researchers do this
by inserting a gene for antibiotic resistance that is activated only
when proteins characteristic of stem cells are expressed. The cells can
then be doused with antibiotics, killing off the failures.
The
protein Yamanaka used as a marker for stem cells last year was not
terribly good at identifying reprogrammed cells. This time, all three
groups used two other protein markers - Nanog and Oct4 - to great
effect. All three groups were able to produce chimaeric mice using iPS
cells isolated in this way; and the mice passed iPS DNA on to their
offspring.
Jaenisch
also used a special embryo to produce fetuses whose cells were derived
entirely from iPS cells. "Only the best embryonic stem cells can do
this," he says.
"It's
unbelievable, just amazing," says Schöler, who heard Jaenisch present
his results at a meeting on 31 May in Bavaria. "For me it's like Dolly
[the first cloned mammal]. It's that type of accomplishment."
The
method is inviting. Whereas cloning with humans was limited by the
number of available eggs and by a tricky technique that takes some six
months to master, Yamanaka's method can use the most basic cells and
can be accomplished with simple lab techniques.
But
applying the method to human cells has yet to be successful. "We are
working very hard - day and night," says Yamanaka. It will probably
require more transcription factors, he adds.
If
it works, researchers could produce iPS cells from patients with
conditions such as Parkinson's disease or diabetes and observe the
molecular changes in the cells as they develop. This 'disease in a
dish' would offer the chance to see how different environmental factors
contribute to the condition, and to test the ability of drugs to check
disease progression.
But the iPS cells aren't perfect, and could not be used
safely to make genetically matched cells for transplant in, for
example, spinal-cord injuries. Yamanaka found that one of the factors
seems to contribute to cancer in 20% of his chimaeric mice. He thinks
this can be fixed, but the retroviruses used may themselves also cause
mutations and cancer. "This is really dangerous. We would never
transplant these into a patient," says Jaenisch. In his view, research
into embryonic stem cells made by cloning remains "absolutely
essential".
If
the past year is anything to judge by, change will come quickly. "I'm
not sure if it will be us, or Jaenisch, or someone else, but I expect
some big success with humans in the next year," says Yamanaka.
Additional reporting by Heidi LedfordFor more on alternative stem-cell work, see 'Stem cells: Recycling the abnormal'; and see http://www.nature.com/stemcellsReferences- Okita, K., Ichisaka, T. & Yamanaka, S. Nature doi:10.1038/nature05934 (2007).
- Wernig, M. et al. Nature doi:10.1038/nature05944 (2007).
- Maherali, N. et al. Cell Stem Cell doi:10.1016/j.stem.2007.05.014 (2007).
- Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Cell 126, 663-676 (2006).
|